Should people wanting IVF treatment on the NHS be treated before others suffering from chronic disease? - nhs chronic urticaria
For example ... Drawbacks if cancer drugs cost so much, so that the bottom of NHS IVF treatment. Or is it a human right to be blessed with children be
Friday, February 12, 2010
Nhs Chronic Urticaria Should People Wanting IVF Treatment On The NHS Be Treated Before Others Suffering From Chronic Disease?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
The NHS should fund the life of the first fund, which is not something not yet live! If people pay soo bad for him, or wait for each year are the most important cases dealt with first!
This has nothing to do with each other.
It is possible to treat all diseases, not out.
I understand very well what they say or, but as a person, namely me, who may not have children, because I Eny, I had an NHS OPP .. People are trained to me in this department to treat on his side of the case in medicine, people are treating the other side of the disease, have learned their craft, it is very annoying when all U Want a child , then u get the women, the children like rabbits and can not take care of them propaly, the argument might go, I really can not answer ur question because I do not know what they say, well, I " I had a PPO, but again, I lost 2 family members with cancer
You need to be handled simultaneously.
This country is sending too much taxpayer money overseas.
We do not have our own house in order.
increasingly the NHS will not pay for IVF. Currently, there are many exceptions. I have great sympathy for couples necessarily have children, and I probably have no idea how they feel bad. But I agree they are not sick and I think they have a lower priority.
On the other hand I think that governments, particularly the current waste countless billions each year in the total garbage that serves no one!
Sorry for those who can not have children, but I do not agree with IVF, and especially not on people's lives for it.
There are so many children in this world and who was not from a loving father, why assume that instead of bringing more children come into the world would benefit. Or it is a miniature replica of themselves, their main concern is necessary.
Whether it is a human right to children when medical procedures were first used.
NO! The cancer must be healed primarily Im sorry, but there is more life than children and so many kids there without their parents do not assume why?
I personally think we should start to look after the children we already have in this world instead of trying to bring more!
Why we are not happy with what we already have? Cancer patients deserve, can best be treated in the way!
Do not be silly, if his death is certainly more right than someone who wants children ...
Post a Comment